Thursday, 30 May 2013

The Woolwich Murder: Why there is no debate regarding the death penalty



            I seem to go through a range of emotions and conversations when I’m drinking. The emotions usually range anywhere between utter depression and complete delirium; it’s a wide scale. Conversation topics appear on an even wider scale; just yesterday for instance we were discussing the Woolwich murders until one of my friends decided the conversation was too dark and proceeded to discuss the cleavage of the girl on another table.
            But before the boob banter, we were having a very serious discussion, with very different opinions. The argument was whether or not the death penalty should be brought back, an extremely sensitive and controversial topic, but a topic that is hot on the minds of many people since that stomach wrenching day in South London just a few weeks ago. There were many reasons for, including the lack of space in prisons, making examples of serious offenders in order to prevent future scenarios from happening etc. There were also arguments against, such as the possibility of false convictions, death being an easy way out, moving against society’s progress and so on.
            This argument could go on for days, and there would rarely be a solution wherein everybody involved in the discussion comes to a rational agreement either way. At the end of the conversation, it came down to two for, and three against. I was one of the people against the death penalty, and it is for one simple reason. Forgetting my beliefs that no one has the right to murder, even if that person has murdered, I do not believe that any human being should have the right to take another’s life. Forgetting the possible economic benefits, forgetting every other factor, it comes down to one thing.
            I would like to tell you a story.
            Once Upon a Time, a mother gave birth to an innocent child. This child was born without philosophy or morals, and had only simple needs; water, food, shelter and love. The mother watched her child grow, she fed him when he was hungry, she cuddled him when he was sad, and taught him right and wrong, the best that any human being can. The child learned actions, he learned to make sounds and he learned how to smile and laugh.
            The child grew, the child went to school and the child experienced friendships, love, happiness, sadness, bliss and disgust. He stayed close to his mother, but became independent; he developed his own beliefs, interpreted ideas in his own way and came to his own conclusions about right and wrong. Whether his interpretations were correct or not, his mother supported his right to free speech and opinion. Whether she liked it or not, he was growing up.
            The child eventually became a man, a man with his own responsibilities, a man who was independent, looked after himself and remembered his childhood. The man would remember the woman who would cuddle him when he was sad, feed him when he was hungry and tried to teach him right from wrong the best that she could. The man developed extreme beliefs, he began making his own decisions on what he interpreted was right and wrong. The man became sucked into a cesspool of extremism and hatred; the man became an evil, horrid, vile beast that isn’t fit to suck the scum from the bottom of a festering swamp.
            The man decapitated another human being, a human being with thoughts, emotions, who at one point was the same blank canvass. The man killed one of his own species, one of his own kind in the most brutal and barbarous way imaginable. The man even had the audacity to brag and justify what he had done, with the blood still thick on his hands. The man had become an evil product of an evil belief.
            But he still had a mother; a mother who cared for him and a mother who loved him unconditionally. To that mother, he was still the blank canvass, he was still the ball of light that she brought into the world, and he was still her child. Now imagine that mother watching her child take someone’s life, and then watch another man kill her child because of it. Imagine you are that mother, or father. Could you watch your child die? Could you support an idea in which that is a possibility?
            The man is evil. The man deserves to be punished and punished severely. The man deserves to spend the remainder of his life giving back to the community, giving back to the society whose laws he betrayed and the families whose lives he has affected forever. The man does not deserve to die. This man may be a despicable murderer, and just another scumbag to us, but think about what that man is to his mother.
            If that man was your child, would you support the death penalty?


Thank you for reading. 

-Follow on Twitter- TheOpenRoad91

No comments:

Post a Comment